Davis v. Social Security, Commissioner of
| Megan L Davis |
| Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security, Commissioner of |
| 2:2023cv10004 |
| January 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
TRANSCRIPT of Social Security Proceedings (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation) (Toomey, Zak)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Zak Toomey on behalf of All Defendants. (Toomey, Zak)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Ridgell-Boltz on behalf of Social Security, Commissioner of. (Ridgell-Boltz, Laura)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY NOTICE of New Case Filing to Social Security Administration's Office of the General Counsel and the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan. (DAll)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Megan L Davis against Commissioner of Social Security. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9180426 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit summons, #3 Exhibit summons, #4 Exhibit summons) (Jones, Daniel)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
