Gillis v. Social Security
Plaintiff: Keith Alexander Gillis
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 4:2014cv11354
Filed: April 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Flint Office
County: Macomb
Presiding Judge:
Referring Judge:
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPINION and ORDER (1) Overruling Plaintiffs Objections 22 , (2) Accepting the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation 21 , (3) Denying Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 17 , and (4) Granting Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 19 . Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (CHad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gillis v. Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Alexander Gillis
Represented By: Diane M. Kwitoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?