Salazar v. Tribar Manufacturing
Plaintiff: Chantel Salazar
Defendant: Tribar Manufacturing
Case Number: 4:2014cv12935
Filed: July 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Flint Office
County: Ingham
Presiding Judge: Terrence G. Berg
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 12 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, and GRANTING 13 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salazar v. Tribar Manufacturing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tribar Manufacturing
Represented By: David Cessante
Represented By: Ellen E. Hoeppner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chantel Salazar
Represented By: Brandon W. Gardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?