PERRY et al v. Randstad General Partner (US) LLC
| JUDITH PERRY, ERIN LANE, SUHAIMA CHOUDHURY and AIMEE DOOLING |
| Randstad General Partner (US) LLC |
| 2:2014cv11240 |
| March 26, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Ann Arbor Office |
| Oakland |
| Mona K. Majzoub |
| John Corbett O'Meara |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 135 Motion to Review Action of Taxation Clerk. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
|
|
Filing
131
OPINION and ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 125 Renewed MOTION for Summary Judgment, Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER denying 113 Motion to Review Action of Taxation Clerk. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER denying 98 Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
|
|
Filing
94
OPINION AND ORDER denying 36 Motion to Certify Class; granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 64 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge John Corbett O'Meara. (WBar)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 85 Motion to Compel; denying 28 Motion to Compel - Signed by Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub. (LBar)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
