Betty #247284 v. Heyns et al
Quentin D. Betty #247284 |
Daniel H. Heyns, Carmen D. Palmer, Unknown Smith, Unknown Chaney, Unknown Becher, Unknown Schmuggerow, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and Unknown Part(y)(ies) |
1:2015cv00445 |
April 30, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Southern Division (1) Office |
Ionia |
Robert J. Jonker |
Hugh W. Brenneman |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 79 , 78 , 91 , 66 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb) |
Filing 87 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 73 , 60 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb) |
Filing 42 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 24 , 38 , 20 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker; Defendants' Becher and Dr. Schmuggerow are DISMISSED from this action. Court to proceed with First Amendment retaliation claim as to Defendant Chaney (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb) |
Filing 32 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 27 ; Plaintiff's motion for extension of time for service is denied 17 ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, ymc) |
Filing 7 OPINION ; signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker (Chief Judge Robert J. Jonker, mil) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.