Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Timothy Smith |
Commissioner of Social Security |
(Boston office of the) Social Security Administration |
1:2018cv01235 |
November 5, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ray Kent |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Amy C. Bland on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Bland, Amy) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed on Timothy Smith, US Attorney and US Attorney General; service upon defendant, Timothy Smith complete on 11/9/2018, answer due 1/8/2019 (Geelhoed, Thomas) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ns) |
Filing 4 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Magistrate Judge Ray Kent (ns) |
Filing 3 Memorandum regarding potentially related case returned to Clerk from Magistrate Judge Kent indicating that this case is related to 1:14-cv-920 (jlb) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Geelhoed, Thomas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Timothy Smith (Geelhoed, Thomas) Modified text on 11/5/2018 (jlg) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Timothy Smith in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4282357 (Geelhoed, Thomas) Modified text on 11/5/2018 (jlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.