Penley #256574 v. Davids
Petitioner: Kenneth Penley #256574
Respondent: John Davids
Case Number: 1:2020cv00132
Filed: February 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Phillip J Green
Referring Judge: Janet T Neff
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE by certified mail upon Attorney General March 18, 2020 (mg)
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order SERVICE by CERTIFIED MAIL in a habeas action: copy of habeas petition and order to answer sent by certified mail, article number 7001 0360 0000 8677 6339 as to the Attorney General; Respondent John Davids served via regular mail (jmw)
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Copy of Order to Answer (Habeas), #7 sent via U.S. Mail to Kenneth Penley #256574 (mg)
March 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHER PLEADING: the Clerk to serve a copy of the petition and brief by regular mail on the respondent and one copy by certified mail on the Attorney General of the State of MI; respondent to answer the habeas petition within 180 days; no extensions will be granted; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a habeas action; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Copy of Order to Proceed IFP (Habeas) #6 sent via U.S. Mail to Kenneth Penley #256574 (jlb)
March 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE by petitioner Kenneth Penley #256574 re Prisoner Financial Documents (Cure Deficiency), #4 (jlb)
March 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISONER FINANCIAL DOCUMENT(S) (cure deficiency): Application for IFP, Trust Fund Account Activity, Motion for IFP, Certificate of Service submitted by plaintiff Kenneth Penley #256574 to cure deficiency (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Motion for IFP) (jlb)
February 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Copy of Deficiency Order, #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Kenneth Penley #256574 (mg)
February 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DEFICIENCY ORDER: petitioner has failed to pay the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis;deficiency to be cured by 3/18/2020 or the action will be dismissed filing fee to be submitted by 3/18/2020; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (mg)
February 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Kenneth Penley #256574 (Attachments: #1 Attachment A, #2 Attachment B, #3 Attachment C) (mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Penley #256574 v. Davids
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Davids
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth Penley #256574
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?