Phillips et al v. Capital Internal Medicine Associates, P.C. et al
| Alexis Phillips and Sarah Denham |
| Capital Internal Medicine Associates, P.C. and Joseph Kozlowski |
| 1:2023cv00429 |
| April 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Sally J Berens |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Alexis Phillips, Sarah Denham as to Capital Internal Medicine Associates, P.C. waiver sent on 4/28/2023, answer due 6/27/2023 (Seeger, Tim)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Capital Internal Medicine Associates, P.C., Joseph Kozlowski (jrg)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Hala Y. Jarbou (jrg)
|
|
Filing 3
PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Seeger, Tim)
|
|
Filing 2
PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Seeger, Tim)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with jury demand against Capital Internal Medicine Associates, PC filed by Alexis Phillips, Sarah Denham (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Charges of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit Right to Sue Letters) (Seeger, Tim)
|
|
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiffs Sarah Denham, Alexis Phillips in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-7042546 (Seeger, Tim)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
