Woten v. American National Insurance Company et al
| Helen Woten |
| American National Insurance Company and Unknown Defendants 1-10 |
| 1:2010cv00064 |
| February 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| Harrison |
| Louis Guirola |
| Robert H. Walker |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
JUDGMENT ON A JURY VERDICT: Ordered that the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant recover its costs from the plaintiff. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 11/3/11 (RLW)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Plaintiff's claims against Unknown Defendants 1-10 are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 12/13/10. (RLW)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claims against American National Insurance Company are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff is required to inform the Court in writing within 30 days of the date of this Order whether she intends to pursue her claims against the unknown defendants. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the claims against them, without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 10/21/10. (RLW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
