Howard v. ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc. et al
| Tammy T. Howard |
| ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc., Citimortgage, Inc. and John Does 1-10 |
| 1:2013cv00543 |
| July 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| Greene |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.'s 28 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' claims for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Prac tices Act, the Fair Credit Report Act, and the Home Affordable Modification Program are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs' state law claims, as discussed in this opinion, remain pending. Counsel for the parties are to contact the chambers of Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order to schedule a case management conference. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on December 2, 2014 (dsl)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss; granting 9 Motion to Dismiss - Plaintiff's claims against Wells Fargo and Federal Home Loan Bank Chicago c/o Wells Fargo (FHLB) are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 3/26/2014 (scp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
