Dowdy & Dowdy Partnership v. Arbitron, Inc. et al
| Dowdy & Dowdy Partnership |
| Arbitron, Inc., Clear Channel Communications, Inc., CC License, LLC, Chase Radio Properties, Inc., Aloha Station Trust, LLC and Capstar TX Limited Partnership |
| 2:2009cv00253 |
| December 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Hattiesburg Office |
| Jones |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting Defendants' 38 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; finding as moot Plaintiff's 46 Motion to Strike. A separate Judgment shall be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on November 24, 2010 (dsl)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting Defendant Arbitron, Inc.'s 28 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Defendant Arbitron is dismissed without prejudice. A separate Judgment shall be entered. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on October 6, 2010 (dsl)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 35 Motion to Stay Discovery; granting 37 Motion to Stay Case. All discovery in this matter is stayed pending disposition of the pending motions to dismiss. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 9/30/10 (scp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
