Donald v. Arrowood Indemnity Company et al
Darlene S. Donald |
Arrowood Indemnity Company, Genex Services, Inc., National Healthcare Resources, Inc., Kimberly Wiltshire, Charlene Fairchild and John Does A,B,C |
2:2010cv00227 |
September 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Hattiesburg Office |
Jones |
Michael T. Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 103 ORDER granting 67 Motion to Stay Discovery as to National Healthcare Resources, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on August 1, 2011. (KM) |
Filing 69 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion to Compel; granting 58 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Revised deadlines will be set with the input of all parties at a telephonic hearing to be noticed by the court; an amended scheduling order will follow. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on May 31, 2011. (jsm) |
Filing 20 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Remand and dismissing Defendant Charlene Fairchild with prejudice as being improperly joined. The stay previously imposed in this matter is lifted and the parties are directed to contact Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker within ten days of the date of this order for the entry of a Case Management Order. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on November 23, 2010 (dsl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.