Stark v. University of Southern Mississippi et al
Plaintiff: Diane Stark
Defendant: Martha Saunders, University of Southern Mississippi and Jeff Hammond
Case Number: 2:2013cv00031
Filed: February 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Hattiesburg Office
County: Forrest
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 174 ORDER denying Defendant Martha Saunders' 100 Motion to Dismiss; denying Defendant Saunders' 137 Motion to Alter Judgment; and denying Defendant Saunders' 139 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on August 21, 2014 (dsl)
April 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 104 Motion for Stay of Discovery; denying Plaintiff's 112 Motion to Strike ;and finding as moot Plaintiff's 114 Motion to Stay Response. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on April 3, 2014 (dsl)
March 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Dr. Martha Saunders' 62 Motion to Dismiss; and granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 90 Motion to Strike Reply. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on March 25, 2014 (dsl)
October 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER denying 81 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 10/21/2013 (scp)
October 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER denying 52 Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice; granting 56 Motion for Relief Pursuant to FRCP Rule 56(d); denying 74 Motion for Relief Pursuant to FRCP Rule 56(d) and Local Rule 16. Plaintiff shall file her response to Dr. Saunders' Motion to Dismiss 62 within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 10/8/2013 (scp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stark v. University of Southern Mississippi et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martha Saunders
Represented By: Alan M. Purdie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University of Southern Mississippi
Represented By: Alan M. Purdie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff Hammond
Represented By: Alan M. Purdie
Represented By: J. Cal Mayo, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diane Stark
Represented By: Kim Turner Chaze
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?