Davis Jewelers of Monticello, Inc. v. Interface Security Systems, L.L.C. et al

Defendant: Interface Security Systems, L.L.C. and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff: Davis Jewelers of Monticello, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv00066
Filed: April 4, 2013
Court: Mississippi Southern District Court
Office: Hattiesburg Office
County: Lawrence
Referring Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis Jewelers of Monticello, Inc. v. Interface Security Systems, L.L.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Interface Security Systems, L.L.C.
Represented By: Edward J. Currie, Jr.
Represented By: Joseph W. Gill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Davis Jewelers of Monticello, Inc.
Represented By: Jamie N. Hardison-Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.