Mayfield v. Brewer
Plaintiff: Samuel Mayfield
Defendant: Mark Brewer and City of Laurel
Case Number: 2:2013cv00073
Filed: April 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Hattiesburg Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 125 Motion to Exclude Certain Deposition Testimony at Trial. The motion is granted to the extent that the following portions of Dr. James C. Lamousin's deposition will be excluded from the jury at trial: (i) page 52, line 21 through page 58, line 25; (ii) page 95, line 3 through page 96, line 6; (iii) Page 96, line 21 through page 97, line 2; and (iv) page 97, line 7 through page 99, line 16. The motion is otherwise denied. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on December 16, 2014 (dsl)
October 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 101 Motion to Exclude. The motion is granted to the extent that Dr. Jeffeory G. Hynes is precluded from offering testimony at trial regarding: (i) the reasonableness of the force used by Sergeant Brewer during the arrest of the Plaintiff (including the opinion that Sergeant Brewer used excessive force); (ii) whether Sergeant Brewer's use of force complied with the Laurel Police Department's Use of Force Policy; and (iii ) the adequacy of the City's training of its police officers. The motion is otherwise denied. Defendants' 115 Motion in Limine is granted in part and denied in part as outlined above; and Plaintiff's 116 Motion in Limine is granted in part and denied in part as outlined above. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on October 28, 2014 (dsl)
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 98 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary Judgment is granted in favor of the City on the Plaintiff's failure to train police officers and custom of excessive force claims. Plaintiff's remaining claims will proceed to trial. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on October 22, 2014 (dsl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mayfield v. Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel Mayfield
Represented By: Scott Winston Colom
Represented By: Wilbur O. Colom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Laurel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?