Riels et al v. Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
Delano Riels and Margaret Riels |
Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and John Does 1 through 10 |
2:2014cv00057 |
April 25, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
Forrest |
Michael T. Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER finding as mootDefendants' 35 Motion to Strike; and granting Defendants' 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. A separate Judgment shall be entered. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on October 20, 2015 (dsl) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s 3 Motion to Dismiss. The motion is granted to the extent the Court finds that the TRO issued by the state court prior to removal expired on May 9, 2014, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b)(2). The motion is denied to the extent the Defendant seeks any associated costs and attorney's fees. Counsel for the parties are to contact the chambers of U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker within seven (7) days of the entry of this order to schedule a case management conference. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on October 3, 2014 (dsl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.