Farris v. Brevard et al
Plaintiff: Timothy M. Farris
Defendant: Brent Brevard, John Does 1-10 and Jane Does 1-10
Counter_claimant: Brent Brevard
Counter_defendant: Timothy M. Farris
Case Number: 2:2015cv00025
Filed: March 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office
County: Forrest
Presiding Judge: John C. Gargiulo
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying Defendant's 84 Motion in Limine. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on July 18, 2016 (dsl)
June 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 44 Motion to Amend; granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 56 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 68 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 6/10/2016 (scp)
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Remand. Counsel for the parties are directed to contact the chambers of United States Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo within seven (7) days of the entry of this Order to schedule a case management conference. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on June 24, 2015. (dsl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Farris v. Brevard et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy M. Farris
Represented By: Dorrance Aultman
Represented By: Timothy M. Farris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brent Brevard
Represented By: Matthew W. McDade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Brent Brevard
Represented By: Matthew W. McDade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Timothy M. Farris
Represented By: Dorrance Aultman
Represented By: Timothy M. Farris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?