United States of America v. Parker
||United States of America
||Gary Wade Parker
||November 18, 2010
||Mississippi Southern District Court
||F. Keith Ball
||Daniel P. Jordan
|Nature of Suit:
||Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 4, 2011
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition to Enforce IRS Summons. Respondent, Gary Wade Parker, present himself to William D. Stone, Revenue Officer, Internal Revenue Service on Monday, February 14, 2 011, at 1:00 p.m. at 2209 Fifth Street North, Columbus, Mississippi 39706-2211, for the purpose of complying with the IRS Summons. In the event the Respondent fails to appear or otherwise comply with this Order and upon notice to the Court by the Pe titioner of the Respondent's failure to comply, a bench warrant be issued by the Court. A copy of this Order and the attached Exhibit A shall be personally served on Respondent Gary Wade Parker, by an official of the Internal Revenue Service wi thin five (5) days of the date of this Order and the Internal Revenue Service and/or the United States Attorney shall within twenty-four (24) hours from the date of this Order cause a copy of this Order to be sent by certified mail to Respondent, Gary Wade Parker. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on February 4, 2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Summons) (SP)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.