United States of America v. Williams

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: John W. Williams, Jr.
Case Number: 3:2012mc00059
Filed: January 26, 2012
Court: Mississippi Southern District Court
Office: Jackson Office
County: Adams
Referring Judge: F. Keith Ball
Presiding Judge: Carlton W. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26:7402

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 7, 2012 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting 16 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 8/7/2012. (AC)
April 19, 2012 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 04/19/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit IRS Summons) (AC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Pshon Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John W. Williams, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.