Fraternity Collection, LLC v. FARGNOLI
Plaintiff: Fraternity Collection, LLC
Defendant: ELISE FARGNOLI
Case Number: 3:2013cv00664
Filed: October 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Jackson Office
County: Hinds
Presiding Judge: F. Keith Ball
Presiding Judge: Carlton W. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER denying 37 Motion for Declaratory Judgment. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 03/31/2015 (AC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fraternity Collection, LLC v. FARGNOLI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fraternity Collection, LLC
Represented By: Eric Foster Hatten
Represented By: John M. Lassiter
Represented By: Ellen Teresa Mathews - PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ELISE FARGNOLI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?