Briggs et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
Eddie J. Briggs and Rebecca Briggs |
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and J. L. White, Jr. |
3:2014cv00016 |
January 9, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Northern (Jackson) Office |
Kemper |
F. Keith Ball |
Daniel P. Jordan |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 147 ORDER denying 129 Motion to Review; denying 131 Motion for New Trial; denying 133 Motion to Alter Judgment for the reasons set out in the order. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on January 26, 2016. (SP) |
Filing 110 ORDER granting 95 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 97 Motion in Limine; and granting 98 Motion in Limine. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on May 22, 2015. (EH) |
Filing 91 ORDER denying 71 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 84 Motion for Sanctions for the reasons set out in the order. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on March 20, 2015. (SP) |
Filing 13 ORDER denying 6 Motion to Remand to State Court for the reasons stated in the order. The claims against J. L. White, Jr. are dismissed with prejudice. The parties are directed to contact the magistrate judge within ten days of the entry of this order to reset the case for a case management conference. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on April 7, 2014. (SP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.