Whatley v. Lee
Plaintiff: Wallace W. Whatley
Defendant: Ernest Lee
Case Number: 3:2014cv00021
Filed: January 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Northern (Jackson) Office
County: Sunflower
Presiding Judge: Tom S. Lee
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, dismissing this case with prejudice. A certificate of appealability should not issue for the reasons set forth herein. A separate judgment will be entered. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 12/4/15 (*copy mailed to Wallace W. Whatley # 39566, MSP, Unit 30-C, A-Zone, Bed #88, Parchman, MS 38738) (LWE)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whatley v. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wallace W. Whatley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ernest Lee
Represented By: Jim Hood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?