South et al v. Austin et al
Plaintiff: Kawanza South and Leonard South
Defendant: Joseph Austin, Vicksburg Women's Care, Inc. and John and Jane Does, 1-5
Case Number: 3:2015cv00342
Filed: May 5, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Northern (Jackson) Office
County: Warren
Presiding Judge: F. Keith Ball
Presiding Judge: Daniel P. Jordan
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ORDER denying 125 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; granting in part, denying in part, and taking under advisement 128 Motion in Limine; taking under adv isement 131 Motion in Limine; granting 132 Motion in Limine; taking under advisement 138 Motion to Exclude; denying 147 Motion to Strike. The parties are instructed to contact the Courts Courtroom Deputy by September 1 to schedule a telephonic conference. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on 8/28/17. (km)
December 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 114 ORDER granting 86 Motion in Limine; denying 88 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 94 Motion in Limine; denying 95 Motion in Limine; denying 104 Motion for Leave to File; denying as moot 109 Motion for Protective Order for the reasons set out in the Order. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on December 12, 2016. (SP)
December 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER denying 69 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 76 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on December 2, 2016 (HF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: South et al v. Austin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kawanza South
Represented By: Rajita Iyer Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leonard South
Represented By: Rajita Iyer Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Austin
Represented By: R. E. Parker, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vicksburg Women's Care, Inc.
Represented By: R. E. Parker, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and Jane Does, 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?