South et al v. Austin et al
Kawanza South and Leonard South |
Joseph Austin, Vicksburg Women's Care, Inc. and John and Jane Does, 1-5 |
3:2015cv00342 |
May 5, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Northern (Jackson) Office |
Warren |
F. Keith Ball |
Daniel P. Jordan |
Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 153 ORDER denying 125 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; granting in part, denying in part, and taking under advisement 128 Motion in Limine; taking under adv isement 131 Motion in Limine; granting 132 Motion in Limine; taking under advisement 138 Motion to Exclude; denying 147 Motion to Strike. The parties are instructed to contact the Courts Courtroom Deputy by September 1 to schedule a telephonic conference. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on 8/28/17. (km) |
Filing 114 ORDER granting 86 Motion in Limine; denying 88 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 94 Motion in Limine; denying 95 Motion in Limine; denying 104 Motion for Leave to File; denying as moot 109 Motion for Protective Order for the reasons set out in the Order. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on December 12, 2016. (SP) |
Filing 103 ORDER denying 69 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 76 Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on December 2, 2016 (HF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.