Renfroe v. Parker et al
| Amanda Kay Renfroe |
| Robert Denver Parker and Does 1-100 |
| 3:2018cv00609 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 11/2/2018 11:15 AM before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e-mail to ball_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference and, once all the parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4460. (JEJ) |
| Filing 4 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Robert Denver Parker.(Cowan, Rebecca) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amanda Kay Renfroe. Robert Denver Parker served on 9/5/2018, answer due 9/26/2018. (Yoder, George) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Robert Denver Parker. (ND) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1-100 and Robert Denver Parker ( Filing fee $ 400 paid; receipt number 34643051597 [#696523] ), filed by Amanda Kay Renfroe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ND) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
