Riverside Construction Company, Inc. v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Riverside Construction Company, Inc. |
Entergy Mississippi, Inc. |
Entergy Mississippi, Inc. |
Entergy Mississippi, Inc. |
5:2013cv00029 |
March 6, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Western Office |
Warren |
Michael T. Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Entergy Mississippi, Inc.'s 17 Motion to Conduct Remand Related Discovery and for Additional Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. The Motion is granted as to extending the time for response to the Motion to Remand. Entergy is granted an additional 20 days from the entry of this Order to file said response. The Motion is denied in all other respects. Riverside's Motion to Limit 21 is granted in part and denied in part. Riverside is under no obligation to respond to Entergy's Remand Related Interrogatories, Requests for Production, and Requests for Admission; and, neither party shall propound any further written discovery or notice any depositions pending the Court's ruling on the Motion to Remand 6 . The motion is denied in all other respects. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on April 25, 2013 (dsl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.