PacifiCorp v. Real Bird et al
| 1:2006cv00122 |
| August 24, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Billings Office |
| Richard F. Cebull |
| Condemnation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 77 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by PacifiCorp, re 85 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by James Real Bird, Kennard Real Bird, Richard Real Bird, Henry Real Bird, Manuela Real Bird, Birdena Real Bird, and re 81 Motion to Stay filed by PacifiCorp. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 4/27/2009. See attached order for specifics. (CAA, )
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 103 Motion for Order/Judgment, filed by PacifiCorp, 120 Findings and Recommendations,. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 1/5/2009. (CAA, )
|
|
Filing
120
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 39 Amended Complaint, filed by PacifiCorp Objections to F&R due by 12/12/2008. Signed by Magistrate Carolyn S Ostby on 11/24/2008. (AMC, ) Modified on 11/25/2008 to add link to 103 Motion for Entry by Default of Preliminary Condemnation Order (JDH).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PacifiCorp v. Real Bird et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
