Matthew v. Big Horn County Jail et al
| David James Matthew |
| Big Horn County Jail, Big Horn County, Sheriff Simpson, Big Horn Valley Clinic, Deputy Atkinson and Jaylene |
| 1:2015cv00038 |
| May 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Billings Office |
| BIG HORN |
| Carolyn S Ostby |
| Susan P. Watters |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER granting 64 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 70 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 75 Motion for Discovery; denying 79 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; denying 80 Motion for Discovery. Defendants Big Horn Valley Health Center, Inc., Jaylene Pinkerton, LPN; and Paul Murter, PA are DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn S Ostby on 9/28/2016. Mailed to Matthew. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER denying 40 Motion for Injunctive Relief and/or Restraining Order; denying 44 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 50 Motion for Equal Treatment ; denying 51 Motion to Rectify Conflict of Interest ; denying 52 M otion for Sanctions; denying 56 Motion to File Documents; denying 57 Motion for Restraining Order and Injunctive Relief; denying 58 Motion for No Contact Order and Order of Restraint ; denying 59 Motion Objecting to Defendants' Expert Witness Disclosures and Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn S Ostby on 1/25/2016. Mailed to Matthew. (TAG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
