Hedstrom v. Peters
| Keldah Elizabeth Hedstrom |
| Cody Clay Peters |
| 1:2022cv00081 |
| August 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Kathleen L DeSoto |
| Susan P Watters |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Order ReSetting: Preliminary Pretrial Conference reset for 10/21/2022 at 09:00 AM in Missoula, MT before Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto. The preliminary pretrial conference will be conducted by Zoom. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto on 9/29/2022. (TXB) Modified on 9/30/2022 to reflect Zoom info emailed to counsel (APP).
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l)(B), the case is referred to theHonorable Kathleen L. Desoto, United States Magistrate Judge, who will conduct all necessary hearings and submit to the undersigned proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of all motions excepted from the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction by 28 U.S.C. 636(b )(1 )(A). Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 8/31/2022. (AMC)
|
|
Filing 7
STATE COURT DOCKET SHEET (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents) (TAG)
|
|
Filing 6
STATE COURT COMPLAINT (TAG)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE by Keldah Elizabeth Hedstrom re #4 Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order, (Byorth, John)
|
|
Filing 4
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER Preliminary Pretrial Statement due by 10/12/2022. Joint Discovery Plan due by 10/12/2022. Statement of Stipulated Facts due by 10/12/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 10/19/2022 at 11:00 AM in Missoula, MT before Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto. The pretrial conference will be conducted by Zoom. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto on 8/8/2022. (TXB) Modified on 8/9/2022 to reflect Zoom info emailed to counsel (APP).
|
|
Filing 3
CM/ECF Registration Letter mailed to John D. Byorth (APP)
|
|
Filing 2
Service of Consent to Magistrate Judge as Presiding Judge form. Consent/Objection to USMJ Form due by 8/22/2022. (APP) Modified on 8/5/2022 to reflect mailed to counsel Byorth (APP).
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Cody Clay Peters from MT 6th Judicial District Court, Park County, case number DV-2022-14, filed by Cody Clay Peters. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (JDH)
|
|
Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AMTDC-2914170 (JDH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hedstrom v. Peters | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Keldah Elizabeth Hedstrom | |
| Represented By: | John D. Byorth |
| Represented By: | John Byorth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cody Clay Peters | |
| Represented By: | Mark A. Vucurovich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
