Marten v. Justad, M.D. et al
| Ellen Marten |
| Jean Justad, M.D., South Hills Internal Medicine Associates, Gene Haire, Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, State of Montana and Does 1-10 |
| 6:2017cv00031 |
| February 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Helena Office |
| LEWIS & CLARK |
| Charles C. Lovell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Based on the Stipulation of the parties filed on December 5, 2019, (Doc. 129), the above-entitled cause of action is dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4l(a)(l)(A)(ii), as having been fully settled on the merits, each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 12/11/2019. (HEG)
|
|
Filing
122
OPINION and ORDER: 1. Plaintiffs Motion in Limine Regarding Expert Opinions (Doc. 65) is DENIED. 2. Defendant's Motion in Limine re: DOJ Report (Doc. 73) is DENIED as to all but pages 61 and 62 of the report. 3. Plaintiffs Motion in Limine Re garding Glen Marten's Criminal History (Doc. 87) is GRANTED to the extent that Defendant seeks to introduce evidence of Marten's prior convictions and DENIED to the extent Defendant seeks to introduce evidence concerning Marten past behav ior necessary to shed light on MDC staffs reaction to his requests for medical care. 4. Defendant's Motion in Limine Re: Plaintiffs Experts (Doc. 89) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 5. Defendant's Motion in Limine Re: Damages (Doc. 93) is GRANTED. 6. Defendant's Motion in Limine (Doc. 91) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows. See order for complete details and information. Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 9/30/2019. (HEG)
|
|
Filing
120
OPINION AND ORDER: The State's motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs state law claims against it (Doc. 62) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 9/27/2019. (HEG)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDERED: Motion to Quash Subpoena is Denied as MOOT. Counsel for Plaintiff shall serve a copy on Dr.Mulgrew. Joint Status Report due by 7/9/2019.) Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 5/9/2019. (HEG)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER denying 67 Motion for Summary Judgment Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 4/26/2019. (DED)
|
|
Filing
107
OPINION AND ORDER: Haire's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 42) is GRANTED. Counts VI and VII of Plaintiffs Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the caption shall be amended to reflect the dismissal of Haire and the John Doe defendants from this case, leaving the State of Montana as the only remaining defendant. The Clerk of Court is directed to update the docket accordingly. Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 4/25/2019. (HEG)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting in part 49 Motion to Quash and granting 54 Motion to Compel. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 11/9/2018. (JEC)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDERED: The subpoena issued on September 20 is STAYED pending resolution of the State's motion to quash. Plaintiff shall file her response to the motion to quash on or before October 18, 2018. Defendant State of Montana shall file its reply, if any, on or before October 26, 2018. The Court will hear oral argument on the motion on Tuesday, October 30, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom II of the United States Courthouse in Helena, Montana. Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 10/5/2018. (HEG)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying 17 Motion to Dismiss Def. Haire. Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 3/28/2018. (MKB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
