Education Logistics, Inc. et al v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
| Education Logistics, Inc. and Logistics Management, Inc. |
| Laidlaw Transit, Inc. |
| 9:2007cv00006 |
| January 11, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Missoula Office |
| MISSOULA |
| Donald W. Molloy |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
363
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 336 Motion for Judgment NOV; denying 336 Motion for New Trial; granting in part and denying in part 336 Motion to Alter Judgment. Laidlaw's motion 336 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The jury's award shall be reduced by $9,509,756. The Clerk is directed to issue an amended judgment reflecting this reduction. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 4/1/2013. (dle)
|
|
Filing
254
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 245 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 4/4/2012. (dle)
|
|
Filing
252
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 195 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 198 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 3/8/2012. (dle)
|
|
Filing
244
ORDER granting 207 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 1/10/2012. (dle)
|
|
Filing
184
ORDER denying 151 Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying 155 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 5/13/2011. (dle)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
