Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics v. United States Forest Service et al
| Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics |
| United States Forest Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service |
| 9:2008cv00043 |
| March 31, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Environmental Matters Office |
| MISSOULA |
| Donald W. Molloy |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER that the parties' motions for summary judgment are granted in part and denied in part, granting Defendants' 46 MOTION to Strike the Second Johnston Declaration, summary judgment is granted for Defendants 30 Cross MOTION for Summar y Judgment and against plaintiff on Count VI, granting summary judgment for plaintiff as to 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment and against defendants on Counts I, II, III, IV and V; The Environmental assessment and biological opinions are set aside and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the law; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on remand, the Forest Service shall complete consultation with the ESA agencies, complete the NEPA process and issue a final decision no later than 12/31/2011; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's request for additional briefing regarding the appropriate remedy is denied. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 7/27/2010. (BAW, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
