Shoemaker v. Pinnacle Asset Group, LLC

Defendant: Pinnacle Asset Group, LLC
Plaintiff: Debbie Shoemaker
Case Number: 9:2012cv00042
Filed: March 20, 2012
Court: Montana District Court
Office: Missoula Office
County: FLATHEAD
Presiding Judge: Dana L. Christensen
Referring Judge: Jeremiah C. Lynch
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 2, 2012 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 7 Motion for Default Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Shoemaker and against Defendant Pinnacle in the total amount of $7,635.05. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 10/2/2012. (APP, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shoemaker v. Pinnacle Asset Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pinnacle Asset Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Debbie Shoemaker
Represented By: Mies W. Faerber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.