Rattler Holdings, LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
| Rattler Holdings, LLC d/b/a/ Planetary designs |
| United Parcel Service, Inc. and UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. |
| 9:2020cv00117 |
| August 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Dana L Christensen |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens or Alternatively Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Rattler Holdings, LLC. (Rogers, Martin) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Martin Rogers on behalf of Rattler Holdings, LLC (Rogers, Martin) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens or Alternatively Rule 12(b)(6). Response due 9/22/2020. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 9/1/2020. (ASG)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 Brief/Memorandum in Support, #8 MOTION to Dismiss Under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens or Alternatively Rule 12(b)(6) Dana L. Hupp appearing for Plaintiff Rattler Holdings, LLC (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Hupp, Dana) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens or Alternatively Rule 12(b)(6) (Wanda Pacheco) filed by UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Logistics Services Agreement) (Condra, Philip) |
| Filing 9 Brief/Memorandum in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens or Alternatively Rule 12(b)(6) filed by UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Condra, Philip) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens or Alternatively Rule 12(b)(6) Philip B. Condra appearing for Defendants UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. (Condra, Philip) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rattler Holdings, LLC. (Hupp, Dana) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Rattler Holdings, LLC NOTICE OF FILING ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS FOR UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Acknowledgment and Waiver of Service of Summons for UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc) (Hupp, Dana) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Rattler Holdings, LLC NOTICE OF FILING ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS FOR UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Acknoweldgment and Waiver of Service of Summons for United Parcel Service, Inc.) (Hupp, Dana) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT filed by Rattler Holdings, LLC in state court on 2/26/2020. (ASG) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of receipt of state court documents (via file share program). (Attachments: #1 Doc 2, #2 Doc 3, #3 Doc 4) (ASG) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent United Parcel Service, Inc., Other Affiliate UPS SCS (China) Limited for UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc... (Condra, Philip) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. from Montana Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, case number DV-20-259. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (TAG) |
| Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0977-2521499 (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
