George Luster v. James Schomig, et al.
| 2:2004cv00281 |
| March 10, 2004 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
184
ORDER that Defendants Motion for Nontaxable Costs 180 is DENIED. The parties are to bear their own costs. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/20/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
177
ORDER that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 162 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Second Motion for Injunctive Relief 165 is DENIED as moot. Martha Sims terminated. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/17/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
161
ORDER Granting 159 Defendant Martha Sim's Motion for Leave to File to File Successive Summary Judgment Motion. Clerk shall detach and file Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, attached as Exhibit 1. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 160 Appendix of Exhibits to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment are deemed filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's response much be filed within 30 days after this order is served, and Defendant may reply within 14 days after the response is served. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Calendar Call and Jury Trial dates are VACATED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/2/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER denying 136 defendant Sims's Motion for relief from Order #109. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/2/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER granting 124 Motion to Extend Time to file proposed Joint Pretrial Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the venue for the above-entitled action shall remain in the unofficial southern division of the District of Nevada. (Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/9/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/17/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER allowing the parties an additional 20-day period from date of entry of this order to file a proposed joint pretrial order. The parties shall have 20 days from date of entry of this order to file any objections to the court's proposed transfer of venue to the unofficial northern division of the District of Nevada. ( Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/24/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/4/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 84 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred to the Honorable Lawrence R. Leavitt for the purpose of conducting a settlement conference. IT IS FURTHE R ORDERED that if settlement is unsuccessful, the parties shall lodge their proposed joint pretrial order within 20 days of the settlement conference. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/12/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: George Luster v. James Schomig, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
