Arrendondo v. Neven et al
| 2:2009cv02158 |
| November 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Kent J. Dawson |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER re 77 Motion for Summons and Marshal's Service to Complete Service of the Complaint. The Complaint against the remaining defendants is dismissed without prejudice in accordance with FRCP 4(m) for failing to effect service within the all owed time. Furthermore, extending the time to serve the summons and complaint would be futile, because the Court would dismiss the claims in accordance with the Court's prior order 65 . Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 7/16/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER that Plaintiff file proof of service of the summons and complaint on the remaining defendants no later than 7/2/12. Failure to do so will result in his complaint against the remaining defendants being dismissed. Furthermore, to the extend that any remaining defendants were served with the summons and complaint, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause no later than 7/2/12 why the claims should not be dismissed against those defendants in accordance with the Court's prior Order 65 . Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 6/13/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER Granting 23 Motion to Dismiss. FURTHER ORDERED that 42 Motion to Strike 39 Response is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 25 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 50 Motion to Strike 45 Declaration is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 49 Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/19/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 30 Motion for Court Order Requiring Photocopy Service and Granting 35 Motion for Service by the Marshal's Service. Notice of Acceptance or Inability to Accept Service due by 11/15/2011. 7 Copies of Complaint attached to 35 Motion forwarded to USM's Office. Copy of Order sent to Chief of Inmate Services. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER Granting 46 Motion to File Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file its Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment within 5 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/24/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Denying 9 Motion for the Court to Assign the Marshal to Complete Service and Denying 10 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. Amended Complaint deadline: 7/22/2010. Clerk shall file the complaint but shall withhold service at this time. Copy of original complaint, two blank complaint forms and instructions for same mailed to Plaintiff with copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 6/21/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arrendondo v. Neven et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
