Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dunn et al
| 2:2009cv02213 |
| November 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Securities/Commodities Office |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| Philip M. Pro |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 15:77 Securities Fraud |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 90 Motion for an Officer and Director Bar Against Defendant R. Brooke Dunn. (See Order for Details.) ORDERED that defendant shall not serve as an officer or director of any company until November 29, 2014. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
94
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Securities and Exchange Commission against Nicholas P Howey. Nicholas P Howey terminated. See Judgment for details. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/31/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER Granting 85 Motion for Extension of Time to File Final Settlement Papers and Motion for Officer and Director Bar. The court will not grant any further extensions of time unless any motion is joined by all parties or there are truly extenuating circumstances. FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing scheduled for 6/1/12 is hereby VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/25/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER Granting 83 Motion for Extension of Time to File Final Settlement Papers and for an Officer and Director Bar. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/19/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER that the 4/23/12 trial date is vacated. The SEC shall file final settlement papers for approval no later than 4/23/12. On 4/23/12, plaintiff SEC will file its motion and supporting documents in support of an Officer and Director bar, Defendant will then have 10 calendar days to respond to the motion; Plaintiff SEC will then have 10 calendar days to reply to Defendant's response. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/6/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 75 Motions in Limine. (See Order for details) Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/14/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER Granting 76 Motion to Extend Time to Respond to 75 Motion in Limine. Responses due by 12/2/2011. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/18/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER DENYING 52 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. DENYING 54 Motion for Summary Judgment. The hearing set for 7/14/2011 is hereby VACATED. Plaintiffs 60 Motion in limine is GRANTED as to expert Charles R. Lundelius' opinions 1-3 and 8, and is DENIED as to opinions 4-7. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/30/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Granting 42 Motion to Permit Appearance of Government Attorney as to Attorney Dugan W.E. Bliss for Securities and Exchange Commission. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 10/25/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dunn et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
