Kwok v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al
| 2:2009cv02298 |
| December 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Real Property: Foreclosure Office |
| Roger L. Hunt |
| Lawrence R. Leavitt |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 55 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 10/22/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER Denying 46 Motion to Stay Order Pending Appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 1/27/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 42 Emergency Motion Requesting Set Aside of Order 43 . FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Conway comply with the sanctions imposed within the 11/19/10 Order 41 no later than 1/18/11, and then certify to the Court that he has complied no later than 1/21/11. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 12/17/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER that Jeffrey D. Conway is SANCTIONED. Mr Conway shall: Remit a monetary sanction in the amount of $3,000.00 to the Clerk of the Court no later than 12/15/10; Refrain from seeking reimbursement or any other type of compensation from his cl ient, Plaintiff Connie Kwok, with regard to these sanctions or the Order to Show Cause 38 ; Refrain from filing any pleading or motion to the Court wherein he argues that Nevada law requires a defendant to produce the original note or prove its stat us as a real party in interest, holder in due course, current holder of the note, nominee of the current holder of the note, or any other synonymous status as a prerequisite to nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings; Comply with Rule 7-5 of the Local Ru les of Practice and Rule 65 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for ex parte TRO motions; Submit a copy of this Courts Order imposing sanctions to all his clients who have or will challenge foreclosures, no later than 12/15/10, and then certify to t he Court that he has complied no later than 12/20/10. Failure to comply with this Order may prompt the Court to impose additional sanctionsincluding referral to the State Bar of Nevada for disciplinary proceedings. Furthermore, because all remaining claims are now pending adjudication by the MERS MDL, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 11/19/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, cc: Finance)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Denying 37 Plaintiffs' Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Temporary and Permanent Restraining Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall unseal this motion as Plaintiffs have failed to comply with the ex parte requirements o f Local Rule 7-5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Jeffrey D. Conway shall show cause, in writing, no later than 4:00 pm on 10/14/2010, why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 9/29/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Granting 7 Motion to Dismiss Kwok's Fourth Claim Denying 32 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 6/23/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kwok v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
