Jackson v. Nevens et al
Patrick Curtis Jackson |
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight Nevens |
2:2010cv01698 |
September 30, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Kent J. Dawson |
Lawrence R. Leavitt |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER Denying as moot 25 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Notice of Appeal. ORDERED that 26 Motion to Reopen Case and 27 Motion for Reconsideration are DENIED. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/6/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 20 ORDER Granting 12 Motion to Dismiss. The petition 1 is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY, as untimely. Petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 6/1/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 10 ORDER Denying as premature 9 Motion for a Copy of the State's Response to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 1/24/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Filing 3 ORDER Granting 2 Motion to file a Petition with additional pages; Attorney General of the State of Nevada answer due 12/11/2010; Dwight Nevens answer due 12/11/2010. Clerk shall file the Petition. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/27/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.