Gato v. Smith et al
Petitioner: Rene Gato
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Gregory Smith
Case Number: 2:2010cv01748
Filed: October 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Kent J. Dawson
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Johnston
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER Denying 30 Motion to Strike, Denying 29 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, Granting 20 Motion to Dismiss, and Denying as Moot all other pending motions. PETITIONER is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Clerk shall enter judgment. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 9/8/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
January 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER that the Motion to Amend 15 is GRANTED. The Clerk shall detach the proposed amendment from the Motion to Amend and shall it shall be docketed as the petitioners Statement of Additional Claims. The Answer or other response to the petition and the Statement of Additional Claims shall be filed within twenty days of the entry of this order. Respondents motions for enlargement of time 14 17 are GRANTED. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 1/31/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
November 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Denying 11 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order; and ORDER DISREGARDING 12 Motion to Amend 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 11/17/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)
October 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Denying 7 Petitioner's Motion to Submit Evidence. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/27/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
October 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel, Denying 3 Motion for Hearing, and Granting 4 Motion to Submit Affidavit. Clerk shall file the petition and electronically serve the petition upon respondents. Answer due 45 days from entry of this Order. Reply due 45 days from service of the answer. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/19/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gato v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Represented By: Catherine Cortez-Masto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gregory Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rene Gato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?