FH Partners, LLC v. Leany et al
Plaintiff: FH Partners, LLC
Defendant: Tamra Mae L. Hunt, Lynn M. Leany and Todd L. Leany
Case Number: 2:2011cv00796
Filed: May 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Johnston
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 79 FINAL DEFICIENTY JUDGMENT in favor of plaintiff FH Partners, LLC, and against defendant Mark D. Rich ("Rich"), as the successor trustee of the Lynn M. Leany Family Trust, in the amount of five hundred ninety-eight thousand four hundred sixt y-four dollars and twenty-two cents ($598,464.22) plus interest at the contracted default rate of prime plus five and one-half percent. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 8/6/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 77 PROSPECTIVE DEFICIENCY JUDGMENT entered pursuant to 76 Order. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 6/30/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
September 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER Granting 70 Motion to Substitute Party. The clerk of court shall substitute Mark D. Rich, as the identified successor trustee of the Lynn M. Leany Family Trust, as a defendant in this action. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/25/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
March 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER Granting in part and denying in part 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 37 Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Parties shall have 30 days from entry of this order to file opening briefs. Parties shall have 10 days after the filing of opening briefs to file response briefs. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/19/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
January 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 PROTECTIVE ORDER Granting 43 Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 1/24/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FH Partners, LLC v. Leany et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FH Partners, LLC
Represented By: David W. Dachelet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tamra Mae L. Hunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lynn M. Leany
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Todd L. Leany
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?