Brown v. Williams et al
| Kashard O. Brown |
| Catherine Cortez-Masto and Brian E. Williams, Sr. |
| 2:2011cv01058 |
| June 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| James C. Mahan |
| George Foley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
ORDER denying 31 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. A certificate of appealability is GRANTED for Ground 1(b) and DENIED for the remaining grounds. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER Granting 110 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner will have up to and including 4/13/20, to file a reply to 101 the amended answer. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/30/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER Granting 108 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner will have up to and including 3/27/20, to file a reply to 101 the amended answer. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/11/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 106 petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time (third request) is GRANTED. Petitioner will have up to and including 3/6/2020, to file a reply to the 101 amended answer. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/24/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) Modified to link to correct motion on 1/24/2020 (EDS).
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER Granting 104 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner will have up to and including 1/21/20, to file a reply to 101 the amended answer. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/25/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER Granting 102 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner will have up to and including 11/22/19, to file a reply to 101 the amended answer. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER Granting 97 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents will have through 8/7/19, to file and serve an answer to 31 the amended petition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER Granting Respondents' 94 Third Motion to Extend Time Re: 31 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents' answer due 8/2/2019. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER Granting 92 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents will have through 7/12/19, to file and serve an answer to 31 the amended petition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 90 respondents' motion for enlargement of time (first request) is GRANTED. Respondents will have through 6/13/19, to file and serve an answer to 31 the amended petition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 87 respondents' motion for enlargement of time (second request) is GRANTED. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that 79 respondents' motion to dismiss is DENIED. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that that, within forty-five (45) days of entry of this order, respondents must file an answer addressing all claims in the amended petition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/13/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 82 petitioner's unopposed motion for enlargement of time(second request) is GRANTED. Petitioner will have through 3/8/17, to file and serve a response to 79 the motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER Granting 80 petitioner's unopposed motion for enlargement of time (first request) to respond to 79 motion to dismiss. Response is due by 2/6/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/27/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AF)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER Granting 77 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents will have through 12/5/16 to file and serve a response to 31 the amended petition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER Granting 75 Motion to Extend Time re 31 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents will have through 11/21/16, to file and serve a response to 31 the amended petition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER Granting Respondents' 73 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time (First Request). Respondents have through 10/07/2016 to file and serve a response to 31 Amended Petition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 09/07/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER Granting 70 Motion to Reopen Case. The clerk of the court shall reopen the action and lift the stay. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date on which this order is entered to answer or otherwise respond to the amended petition 31 . Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER Granting 60 Petitioner's Motion for Issuance of Stay and Abeyance. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is STAYED pending exhaustion of the unexhausted claims. Petitioner shall return to this court with a motion to reopen within 6 0 days of issuance of the remittitur by the Nevada Supreme Court at the conclusion of the state court proceedings. The clerk of court shall administratively close this action. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 02/06/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER Granting 64 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 60 MOTION to Stay and Abeyance. Responses due by 5/9/2013. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/6/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER that 61 Motion for Enlargement of Time is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have through May 1, 2013, to file and serve a declaration that approves the motion for stay and abeyance 60 . Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/25/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER Granting in part 42 Motion to Dismiss. Ground 1(B) is unexhausted. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to file a motion for dismissal without prejudice of the entire petition, for partial dismissal of ground 1(B), or for other appropriate relief. FURTHER ORDERED that ground 6 of the amended petition 31 is DISMISSEDwith prejudice because it is procedurally defaulted. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/12/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER Granting 56 Motion to Extend Time to Reply re 42 Motion to Dismiss. Replies due by 12/10/2012. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/6/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER Granting 53 Motion to Extend Time to Respond to 42 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 11/21/2012. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/25/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER Granting 51 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 42 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 10/22/2012. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/10/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Granting 40 Motion to Extend Time to Answer/Respond re 31 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents shall have through August 20, 2012 to file and serve an answer or other response to the amended petition 31 . Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/9/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER Granting 38 Motion to Extend Time to File Answer to Petition. Respondents answer due 8/6/2012. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/26/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER Granting 36 Motion to Extend Time to Answer/Respond. Respondents shall have through 6/21/12 to file and serve an answer or other response to the amended petition 31 . Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/18/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDERED that respondents shall have 45 days from the date of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Petition 31 . If respondents file and serve an answer, then they shall comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and then petitioner shall have 45 days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/22/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER Granting 28 MOTION to Extend Time regarding dispositive matter (Second Request) MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE AN AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; and Granting 29 MOTION to Extend Time regarding dispositi ve matter (Third Request) MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE AN AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Petitioner shall have through 2/28/12 to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/23/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
