Litwin v. Neven et al
Christopher Litwin |
D. W. Neven and Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
2:2011cv01616 |
October 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Robert J. Johnston |
James C. Mahan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER Granting 7 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss with prejudice as untimely; Denying 13 Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel as Moot; and Denying 14 Petitioner's Motion for discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate o f appealability is GRANTED on the issue of whether the court was correct in its determination that this action is untimely. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 08/22/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting 5 Motion to Extend Deadline. Respondents shall respond to the Petition by 1/11/2012. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/13/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS) |
Filing 2 ORDER granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk to file Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents shall have 45 days from the date on which the petition was served to answer or otherwise respond to the petition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/27/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, docs to petitioner) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.