Guerra v. Williams et al
| Yoel Guerra |
| Brian Williams and Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
| 2:2011cv01842 |
| November 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| James C. Mahan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER Granting 7 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss. This petition is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of exhaustion. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The clerk of court shall enter final judgment accordingly, in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner, DISMISSING this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 05/30/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER that petitioner shall have 30 days from entry of this order to mail a response to 7 Respondents' prior Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall (a) send petitioner a copy of 7 , 8 , and 9 , including a copy of exhibits attached with 8 , and (b) note the mailing of said copies in the docket entry for this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/30/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - copies of 7 , 8 , and 9 , including exhibit, mailed to petitioner - EDS)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Granting 17 Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, VACATING 10 Order on Motion to Dismiss and 11 Clerk's Judgment, and Reopening this matter. The court otherwise will withhold further action in the matter pending a final resolution of the appeal in No. 12-15762. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 03/18/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CC: USCA via email - AC)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER that the Court CERTIFIES to the Court of Appeals that it is inclined to entertain and grant 17 petitioners motion to vacate order if jurisdiction is restored to the District Court via a remand or the appellate court otherwise grants leave to consider the motion. The clerk shall note this certification in the docket entry for this order and shall forward a copy of the order to the court of appeals Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 01/16/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CC: Court of Appeals via email - AC)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER that the clerk of court shall send petitioner a copy of 19 Response to 17 MOTION to Vacate filed by Respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have 30 days from the entry of this order to mail a reply to the response. Clerk shall forward a copy of this order to the court of appeals via a notice of electronic filing. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/9/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER that, within 30 days of entry of this order, respondents shall file and serve a response to 17 MOTION to Vacate 10 Order on Motion to Dismiss, filed by Yoel Guerra. Reply due by 6/29/2012. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Granting 7 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly, in favor of respondents and against petitioner, dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/2/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
