United States of America v. Cellini et al
United States of America |
Harry Portnoy and Marge L. Cellini |
2:2012cv00471 |
March 20, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Larry R. Hicks |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 CONSENT JUDGMENT of PERMANENT INJUNCTION in favor of United States of America against Harry Portnoy. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/20/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 29 ORDER Granting 28 Motion to Extend Time for Filing Joint Pretrial Order. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 3/27/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/10/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 27 ORDER Granting 26 Motion to Extend Time for Filing Joint Pretrial Order. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/10/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/10/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 25 PERMANENT INJUNCTION against Defendant Marge L. Cellini. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/10/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 17 ORDER Granting 2 Motion for Leave to Appear as to Attorney Richard G. Rose. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/15/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.