Spartalian v. Citibank N.A. et al
| Garegin Spartalian |
| Shelley L. Lanzkowsky, Law Offices of Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson and Hornik LLC, Scott Levine, Citibank N.A., Megan Hummel, JJL Process Corporation, Robert Wagner, Richard A. Russell and Joel Rosenthal |
| 2:2012cv00742 |
| May 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER Granting 51 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting 53 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying 68 Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance to Obtain Evidence; and Denying 70 Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance of Discovery. The Clerk is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants in accordance with the Order and to close the case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 09/27/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 50 Defendants' Motion to Compel as follows: a) Defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Complaint is DENIED; b) Defendants Request for Attorney Fees and Costs for the necessity of filing themotion is D ENIED, and; c) Defendants Request to Preclude Plaintiff from relying upon any evidence or documents not disclosed in his initial disclosures at trial, in motion practice, or for any other reason is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff shall have until 03/15/20 13, in which to serve the Defendants with the supplemental initial disclosures. 56 Plaintiffs Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED to the extent the court will consider the Plaintiffs initial disclosures and attached documents as an exhibit to Plaintiffs opposition to the motion to compel. Any request for relief not specifically addressed in this order is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 03/01/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER Denying 43 Defendants' Motion to Strike and Granting 17 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as follows: 1) Claims 1 and 2 are DISMISSED with prejudice in part to the extent that they rely on the actions of the process server; 2) Claim 3 is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 3) Claim 4 is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 02/13/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Denying 3 Plaintiff's Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/11/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
