Korba v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
| Zan Korba |
| Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company |
| 2:2012cv01391 |
| August 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER Granting 53 Motion to Expedite Briefing Schedule. Countermotion due 9/6/13. Responses due by 9/13/2013. Replies due by 9/17/2013. Hearing on 54 Countermotion for Protective Order set for 9/19/2013 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen, jointly with hearing on 46 Hartford's Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/10/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER that the existing discovery plan and scheduling order deadlines shall apply with the exception of the independent medical examination to be conducted by Dr. Duke on September 4, 2013. Defendant shall have until October 4, 2013, in which to s erve Plaintiff with Dr. Dukes report. Plaintiff shall have until November 4, 2013, in which to complete Dr. Dukes deposition and serve any rebuttal report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/26/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
26
AMENDED ORDER Granting in part 24 MOTION to Seal filed by Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company. Hartford may file the motion and supporting exhibits under seal. However, Hartford shall file a redacted version of the motion and supporting exhibits on the docket in the public record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/18/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Granting in part 24 Motion to Seal. Hartford may file the motion and supporting exhibits under seal. However, Hartford shall file a redacted version of the motion and supporting exhibits on the docket in the public record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/18/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER that the parties shall comply with the requirements of LR 10-5(b), and the Ninth Circuits decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, with respect to any documents filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/19/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Korba v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Darren T Brenner |
| Represented By: | Lindsay C Demaree |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Zan Korba | |
| Represented By: | Riley A. Clayton |
| Represented By: | Michael R. Hall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
