Gonzales v. Shotgun Nevada Investments, et al
Plaintiff: Tom Gonzales
Defendant: Wayne Perry, Shotgun Creek Investments, LLC, Shotgun Creek Las Vegas, LLC and Shotgun Investments Nevada, LLC
Case Number: 2:2013cv00931
Filed: May 24, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 197 ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 34, filed in case no. 3:15-cv-915) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
April 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 183 ORDERED that the Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 175 , 176 ) as to Case No. 2:15-cv-915 are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants are entitled to summary judgment against all claims except the claim for breach of contract. Plaint iff is entitled to summary judgment on liability for breach of contract. Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on the issue of damages. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall a FILE a motion as to suggested equitable remedies for the bre ach by 5/4/2017. Defendants shall have 14 days to respond, and Plaintiff shall have 7 days to reply. FURTHER ORDERED that Howard Bulloch and David Gaffin are DISMISSED. FURTHER ORDERED that the jury trial scheduled for April 17, 2017 in Case No. 2:15-cv- 915 is VACATED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 174 ORDER that the scheduling order is AMENDED, and the parties may file summary judgment motions as to contractual interpretation issues no later than 3/20/2017. Responses due by 3/27/2017. Replies due by 3/31/2017. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 03/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
February 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER granting ECF Nos. 135 , 136 Motions in Limine. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
August 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDERED that the Motion to Disqualify (ECF No. 112) is GRANTED. Hutchison & Steffan is therefore disqualified from representing Defendants in the present cases under Rule 1.10(e). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/31/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
July 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 114 ORDERED that Defendants shall file a response to the Emergency Motion to Disqualify (ECF No. 112 ) on or before 5:00 P.M., Tuesday, July 19, 2016. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a reply on or before 5:00 P.M., Monday, July 25, 2016. FURTHER ORDERED that Oral Argument is set for 09:00 A.M., Friday, July 29, 2016, in LAS VEGAS COURTROOM 4B, before Judge Robert C. Jones. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/5/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER that Case No. 2:13-cv-931 will be tried to the Court but Case No. 2:15-cv-915 will be tried to a jury. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/3/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
February 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER that the Show Cause hearing currently set for 10:00 A.M., Friday, April 15, 2016, in LAS VEGAS COURTROOM TBD, before Judge Robert C. Jones is VACATED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Show Cause hearing is RESCHEDULED as a Telephonic/Video Conferen ce for 1:30 P.M., Thursday, March 3, 2016, in LAS VEGAS COURTROOM TBD, before Judge Robert C. Jones. The parties shall appear in person in Las Vegas. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/17/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
July 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER Granting 80 Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/31/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
July 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER Granting 81 STIPULATION and Order to Continue Calendar Call. Calendar Call reset for 7/30/2015 02:30 PM in Reno Courtroom 6 before Judge Robert C. Jones. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/30/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
September 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER that 55 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 57 Motion in Limine is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/16/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
March 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER that 31 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 36 Motion to Stay Discovery is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that 32 Motion to Compel Discovery under Rule 56(d) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall SUBMIT a proposed sched uling order in accordance with the deadlines requested in the Rule 56(d) motion. Due to the intervening time between the filing of the motion and the issuance of the present Order, Plaintiff may extend the requested deadlines by up to 60 days. FURTHER ORDERED that the civil conspiracy and declaratory judgment claims are STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/10/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
July 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER Granting 10 Motion for Summary Judgment as a Motion to Dismiss, with leave to amend within 21 days of the entry of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 16 Motion to Stay is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/30/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzales v. Shotgun Nevada Investments, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tom Gonzales
Represented By: Matthew S Carter
Represented By: J. Randall Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wayne Perry
Represented By: Lenard E. Schwartzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shotgun Creek Investments, LLC
Represented By: Lenard E. Schwartzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shotgun Creek Las Vegas, LLC
Represented By: Lenard E. Schwartzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shotgun Investments Nevada, LLC
Represented By: Lenard E. Schwartzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?