Crespo-Gutierrez v. Ramirez
| Axel Crespo-Gutierrez |
| Ana Maria Resendiz Ramirez |
| 2:2014cv00175 |
| January 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER Accepting and Adopting in full 29 Report and Recommendation. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 10 ) is dismissed without prejudice.The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/6/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER that 21 Motion to Reattempt Service is GRANTED. Proof of service due by 5/10/2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 22 Motion for US Marshal to Conduct Service is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall issue Summons to Ana Maria Ramirez ("Ramirez"), and shall deliver the Summons, Ramirez's address (doc. # 21 at 5), a copy of the Complaint 10 , and a copy of this Order to the U.S. Marshal Service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall deliver one USM-285 form to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/26/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER that 6 Report and Recommendation is withdrawn. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 8 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Orde r to the Finance Division of the Clerk's Office. Additionally, the Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the Chief of Inmate Services for the Crowley County Correctional Facility, 6564 Highway 96, Olney Springs, CO 81062. Clerk of Court shall file complaint and issue summons to defendant, and deliver the same to the US Marshal for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/14/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: as ordered - EDS)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Denying without prejudice 3 Plaintiff's Second Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall have until Wednesday, 4/7/2014, to file a new, completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis along with a complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 4 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 03/06/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CC: Blank Prisoner IFP and Instructions to Plaintiff - AC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crespo-Gutierrez v. Ramirez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Axel Crespo-Gutierrez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ana Maria Resendiz Ramirez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
