Baumgardner v. Social Security Administration et al
Plaintiff: Gus E. Baumgardner
Defendant: Barry Jenkins and Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2014cv00211
Filed: February 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Koppe
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Adopting 24 Report and Recommendation. FURTHER ORDERED that 21 Motion for Reversal or Remand is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 22 Cross-Motion to Affirm is GRANTED. The clerk is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/1/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that the Clerk shall file the Second Amended Complaint and serve the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration via certified mail and the US Attorney for the District of Nevada. Defendant shall have sixty (60) days from the date of service to file its answer or responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/10/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that the Clerk shall file 6 Amended Complaint. The Amended Complaint is DISMISSED, with leave to amend. Plaintiff will have until June 5, 2014, to file a Second Amended Complaint, if Plaintiff believes he can correct the noted deficiencies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/5/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
April 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that 4 Motion to Extend Time is GRANTED. Amended Complaint deadline: 5/2/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/2/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
March 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER that 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED with the caveat that the fees shall be paid if recovery is made. The Clerk shall file the Complaint. The Complaint is DISMISSED, with leave to amend. Plaintiff will have until April 7, 2014, to file an Amended Complaint, if Plaintiff believes he can correct the noted deficiencies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/5/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baumgardner v. Social Security Administration et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gus E. Baumgardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barry Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?