Kocan v. Colvin
Plaintiff: John W. Kocan
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 2:2014cv01058
Filed: June 30, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Koppe
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of John W. Kocan against Carolyn W. Colvin in the total amount of $8,000.00 in attorney's fees (which includes the $1,425.00 awarded in the stipulated order at ECF 18 ). Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 3/8/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Adopting 29 Report and Recommendation. FURTHER ORDERED that 23 Amended Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED; Kocan is awarded $8,000 in attorney's fees, to be offset by the EAJA fee award already provided. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the total amount of $8,000 (which includes the $1,425.00 awarded in the stipulated order at ECF 18 ). Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/7/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
January 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER re 23 Amended Motion for Attorney Fees. Because neither Plaintiffs' counsel nor the Commissioner has provided an explanation or legal authority on this issue, the Court hereby Orders that they each file supplemental briefs addressing it no later than 2/11/16 Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/28/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
December 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER Denying without prejudice 19 Motion for Attorney Fees. Any renewed motion shall be filed no later than 1/13/16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/30/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting 15 Motion to Remand to the Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/10/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Granting 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall file the Complaint. The Clerk of the Court shall serve the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada. Defendant shall have 60 days from the date of service to file an answer or responsive pleading. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/1/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF ; CC: USM - SLR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kocan v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: April Angelina Alongi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John W. Kocan
Represented By: Marc V Kalagian
Represented By: Gerald Welt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?